Cases
John Mburu vs Kenpoly Manufacturers Ltd
Case Summary
This case involves a complaint lodged by John Mburu against Kenpoly Manufacturers Ltd. The Complainant alleges that his National ID was photographed and uploaded into the Respondent's system without his consent. Despite his request for deletion of the photo, the Respondent ignored his request, infringing on his rights under the Data Protection Act, 2019. The Office of the Data Protection Commissioner (ODPC) investigated the complaint, examining the actions of the Respondent and the evidence provided by both parties.
Issues for Determination
- Whether the Complainant's personal information/data was processed in accordance with the law.
- Whether the complaint was sufficiently addressed by the Respondent.
Determination
The ODPC found that the Complainant's personal data was processed without his consent, violating the Data Protection Act, 2019. Further, the ODPC concluded that the Respondent eventually deleted the Complainant's personal data from its system, thereby resolving the complaint.
Analysis
On whether the Complainant's personal information/data was processed in accordance with the law
The Complainant alleged that his National ID was photographed and uploaded into the Respondent's system without his consent, and despite his request for deletion, the data was retained. According to Section 30 of the Data Protection Act, 2019, processing of personal data requires the data subject's consent or must fall under other lawful bases such as contractual necessity or compliance with legal obligations. The Complainant argued that his consent was not obtained, violating Section 32 of the Act, which stipulates the conditions for valid consent. The Respondent acknowledged the data collection but claimed it was standard procedure for security purposes, providing assurance that the data was not misused. However, they failed to produce evidence of the Complainant's explicit consent. Therefore, the Office of the Data Protection Commissioner (ODPC) concluded that the Complainant's personal data was processed without consent, violating the Act.
On whether the complaint was sufficiently addressed by the Respondent
The Respondent responded to the Complainant’s concerns by email, assuring him that his data was collected as a standard procedure and not misused. Despite the initial lack of action, the ODPC’s investigation revealed that the Respondent had deleted the Complainant's personal data from their system following the complaint. This action demonstrated the Respondent's compliance with the ODPC’s directive, thus addressing the Complainant's concerns. Consequently, the ODPC determined that the complaint was resolved.